Policy

HIS Group considers "Reinforcement of Governance" to be a materiality, and we aspire to be a company which is trusted and chosen by stakeholders based on the HIS Group Philosophy.
In addition, each employee is working to engender a corporate culture and climate which respects the HIS Charter of Corporate Behavior and the rights and positions of every stakeholder

Corporate governance system

Diagram of Corporate Governance System

Diagram of Corporate Governance System

Board of Directors

Based on laws and regulations, the Articles of Incorporation, and internal rules, the Board of Directors responds to the mandate from shareholders. To achieve sustainable growth and enhance corporate value over the medium to long term, the Board makes decisions on basic management policies and important operational execution, while effectively supervising the execution of duties by Directors and Executive Officers, meeting in principle once a month. Under a rapidly changing business environment, to realize fair, transparent, swift, and decisive decision-making, we clarify the division of roles between the supervisory function and the operational execution function. We have constructed a system where each officer executes their duties appropriately and agilely based on authority regulations.
The Board of Directors emphasizes strategic discussions from a medium- to long-term perspective--such as the rolling of the HIS Group medium-term management plan and the promotion of sustainability--going beyond mere management supervision of operations. The Board also regularly receives reports on the business performance and risk management status of major group companies, working to reinforce governance across the entire Group and improve the effectiveness of internal controls. The contents of these deliberations and decided matters are appropriately recorded and managed. In accordance with laws, regulations, and the rules of financial instruments exchanges, we strive for the timely disclosure of information that contributes to constructive dialogue with shareholders and investors.

Audit & Supervisory Committee

The Audit & Supervisory Committee conducts audits in accordance with laws and regulations, the Articles of Incorporation, internal rules, and annual audit plans. The Committee holds individual opinion exchange sessions with Directors and Executive Officers, briefing sessions on important matters, regular report receiving sessions from the internal audit and internal control departments,
and periodic opinion and information exchange sessions with the Accounting Auditor. Audit working papers prepared by full-time Audit & Supervisory Committee members regarding business departments, etc., are made available for review by part-time, External Audit & Supervisory Committee members, who provide necessary additional confirmations and recommendations.
Including the summary of daily audit activities, regular Audit & Supervisory Committee meetings are held in principle once a month.

Main Agenda Items Discussed and Exchanged Opinions On

・ Opinion exchange sessions with Directors, Executive Officers, etc.
・ Opinion exchange sessions with External Directors who are not Audit & Supervisory Committee members
・ Audit reports and opinion/information exchange sessions with the Accounting Auditor
・ Methods and items for evaluating the effectiveness of the Board of Directors and the Audit & Supervisory Committee
・ Information exchange at the Group Corporate Auditors Liaison Committee
・ Investigations and audits related to compliance issues

Internal Audit Department

The Internal Audit Department is established as an organization independent from operational execution departments. In addition to periodic reporting to the Representative Director and the Audit & Supervisory Committee, we have constructed a dual reporting line structure that allows direct reporting to the Board of Directors as necessary. Under this structure, acting as the third line of our Group's "3 Line Model," the department objectively verifies and evaluates the effectiveness of risk management and internal control processes. Furthermore, by collaborating closely with the Audit & Supervisory Committee and the Accounting Auditor, it enhances the effectiveness of audits and contributes to the reinforcement of governance.

Governance Headquarter

The Governance Headquarter was newly established in November 2025 with the aim of optimizing governance-related functions across the entire Group by centralizing legal, risk management, internal control, and general affairs functions and integrating specialized expertise. Its main role is the
early identification of potential risks in new businesses and strategic initiatives, as well as providing appropriate decision-making support to executive management based on objective evaluations. By collaborating closely with business departments and constructing highly effective risk response
measures, we will achieve both regulatory compliance and the maximization of decision-making speed.

Advisory Committees (Human Resources and Nominating Committee, Compensation Committee, Investment Committee, Capital Raising and Investment Committee, Risk and Compliance Committee)

Five committees have been established as advisory bodies to the Board of Directors. The Human Resources / Nomination Committee is responsible for deliberating and proposing draft plans and policies for appointing candidates for Directors, Corporate Auditors, Executive Officers, and Directors of affiliated subsidiaries (or affiliated companies). The Remuneration Committee is responsible for deliberating and proposing remuneration levels, as well as various systems related to evaluation and remuneration for Directors, Executive Officers, and Directors of affiliated subsidiaries. In addition, the Investment Committee is responsible for deliberating and making recommendations from multifaceted perspectives regarding investment policies and the alignment of individual investment projects with management strategies, as well as the validity of investment recovery. The Fund Raising / Investment Committee is responsible for examining and deliberating agile fund-raising methods directed at maintaining financial soundness. Lastly, the Risk / Compliance Committee is responsible for promoting risk management and compliance that support group governance. Following deliberations and reports from each committee, matters are submitted to the Board of Directors as agenda items for resolution and deliberation.

Sustainability Promotion Committee

Composed of Directors and Executive Officers, the Sustainability Promotion Committee collaborates with the Risk / Compliance Committee, operational execution departments, and domestic and international subsidiaries and affiliated companies to discuss important policies and measures. Simultaneously, it promotes sustainability initiatives by monitoring progress against targets. Furthermore, sectional committees and project teams in each sustainability domain conduct regular activities, working to deepen discussions and examinations and improve effectiveness.

Board of Directors and Committee Composition, Number of Meetings Held and Attendance in FY2025

   The Board of Directors*1,    Investment Committee,    Human resources / Nomination Committee,    Financing / Fund Management Committee,    Compensation Committee,       Risk/Compliance Committee*2

*1 In addition to the above number of Board of Directors meetings, there were 6 written resolutions deemed to have been approved by the Board of Directors meetings.
*2 Risk and Compliance Committee changed its status from a task-specific committee to an advisory committee starting with its third meeting in April 2025. Due to changes in committee membership during the term, the number of meetings held varies by committee member.

Position Name Independent Outside Director
Member of Audit and Supervisory Committee
Human resources / Nomination Committee Compensation Committee Investment Committee Financing / Fund Management Committee Risk / Compliance Committee Number of sessions held / Number of times attended
Representative Director, Chairman Yada Motoshi

     14/14
     11/11
     6/6
     5/5
     10/10
     8/8
Representative Director, President Sawada Hidetaka

 ◎

 

     14/14
     6/6
   
 10/10
     5/5
Director  Yamanobe Atsushi

 〇

   

 

     14/14
     11/11

     8/8
Director Gomi Mutsumi

 

 

 

     14/14
     5/5

     8/8

Director Iwama Yuji

   

 

 

Director Sawada Hideo

   

 

 

 

Independent Outside Director Owada Junko        
     14/14
     11/11
     6/6
     10/10
Independent Outside Director
Matsumoto Koichi    
Director
Member of Audit and Supervisory Committee
Sekita Sonoko              14/14
     5/5
Independent Outside Director
Member of Audit and Supervisory Committee
Kaneko Hiroto  〇  〇  〇   〇  〇 

     13/14

     11/11

     6/6

     5/5

     10/10

Independent Outside Director
Member of Audit and Supervisory Committee
Kagawa Shingo  〇 〇   〇    〇  

    14/14

     6/6
     5/5

     10/10

◎ indicates the chairperson, and ○ indicates attending members.

Board of Directors Effectiveness Evaluation

At HIS, we conduct a self-evaluation and analysis of the effectiveness of the Board of Directors once a year. This initiative aims to improve the functionality of the Board of Directors and enhance corporate value.

Evaluation Process

Target Scope

All 11 members of the Board of Directors (8 Directors who are not Audit & Supervisory Committee members, including 2 External Directors; and 3
Directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee members, including 2 External Directors).
Evaluation Method An anonymous questionnaire and tabulation were conducted via a third-party external organization.
Implementation Period

 

The questionnaire response period was in September 2025, and discussions/evaluations based on the tabulated results were held in November 2025.

 

Summary of Questions

Composition of the Board of Directors / Operation of the Board of Directors / Discussions of the Board of Directors / Monitoring functions of the
Board of Directors / Performance of External Directors / Support system for Directors / Training / Dialogue with shareholders (investors) / Own
initiatives / Operation of Advisory Committees / General summary.

Response Status

Completed by all target members.

Material Issues Identified from Evaluation Results

In the previous fiscal year's evaluation of the Board of Directors' effectiveness, the following four items were identified as material issues to be addressed micro-focusedly in the future. The evaluation of each item and future initiatives are as follows:

Main Improvements and Reflections

A. Continuous discussion and reinforcement of supervision by the Board of Directors regarding the group-wide risk
management and governance structure Placing high importance on reinforcing the risk management and governance structure, considerable time was dedicated to discussions, particularly regarding deliberations on the fraudulent and improper receipt of employment adjustment subsidies, etc. (including status reports on investigations by the Special Investigation Committee, identifying root causes, and formulating preventative measures). We are advancing the reinforcement of our corporate governance framework, including revisions to the Risk
/ Compliance Committee regulations and the temporary establishment of the Subsidiary Governance Review Committee.
B. Formulation of policies and execution plans to improve the diversity and expertise of Directors
To respond to the recent expansion of business domains, the advancement of digitalization, and the diversification of our human resource portfolio, an agreement was reached on the revision policy for the Directors' skills matrix. However, to enhance the effectiveness of the Board of Directors, we recognize the continuous need to discuss and examine constructing a management structure with a balanced combination of offensive and defensive capabilities by eliminating expertise imbalances and promoting diversity.
C. Vitalization of discussions regarding group-wide medium- to long-term strategies, including business portfolio restructuring
Aimed at restructuring businesses and strengthening our foundations, regarding business strategies, decisions were made on development investments in growth areas such as the hotel business, as well as investments in venture companies and funds. Concurrently, discussions were held to advance business streamlining to optimize management resources.
D. Setting quantitative targets for non-financial information such as sustainability and reinforcing effectiveness
We position respect for human rights as the core of our management. In December 2024, the "HIS Group Human Rights Policy" was formulated following a resolution by the Board of Directors. We are working to familiarize and instill this policy among our Group's officers and employees, establishing the foundation for human rights due diligence across the entire supply chain. Furthermore, as a response to climate change, we have set medium- to long-term $CO_2$ emission reduction targets, clarifying our commitment to realizing a sustainable society. Moving forward, the Board of Directors aims to improve effectiveness by repeatedly monitoring progress on a regular basis.

Future Issues to Be Addressed

A. Vitalization of discussions regarding medium- to long-term strategies with a strong awareness of stock price, earning capacity, and capital efficiency.
B. Continuous discussion and reinforcement of supervision by the Board of Directors regarding the group-wide risk management and governance structure.
C. Enhancing discussions on sustainability promotion integrated with management strategies and improving effectiveness toward target achievement.
D. Formulation of policies and execution plans to improve the expertise and diversity of Directors.

Selection Process for the Management Structure and Human Resource Criteria

Succession Process

Aimed at sustainable growth and enhancing corporate value within a rapidly changing external environment, the HIS Group transitioned to a new management structure starting January 2026--including the appointment of Shuta Sawada as the new President--following objective evaluations
and appropriate deliberation processes. While executing aggressive strategies that utilize AI and technology with a sense of speed, we will simultaneously achieve management soundness and agility by thoroughly enforcing governance and reinforcing risk management, powerfully driving group management for a new era.

Human Resource Requirements for Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Candidates and Director Candidates: The "Three Capabilities"

1. Fundamental Capability (Kijiku-ryoku): "The capability to pass on the vision and philosophy to the next generation"

Aiming to be a company that lasts for 100 years, individuals who possess high personal aspirations, set short-, medium-, and long-term management visions, and execute management toward their realization. Human resources capable of executing management that connects to the next generation based on the philosophies consistently inherited since our founding.

2. Conceptual Capability (Koso-ryoku): "The capability to conceptualize corporate management and strategies that contribute to social progress"

Human resources who possess a global perspective, can conceptualize corporate strategies that contribute to social progress, human creative development, and world peace, and can lead management.

3. Execution Capability (Jitsugen-ryoku): "The capability to conceptualize strategies and realize them while valuing human resources"

Recognizing that "Human Capital" (or human resources) is the source of value creation generated through corporate activities, individuals who foster a "spirit of challenge" in each person, maximize strengths and diverse personalities, and develop successors for the next generation. Human resources who are admired as leaders, practice self-discipline, demonstrate fairness, openness, and sincerity through actions, and continuously realize strategic concepts.

Officer Remuneration

At the Board of Directors meeting held on August 29, 2025, HIS resolved the determination policy regarding the details of individual remuneration for Directors.

Policy Details

To unleash "sparkling excitement" value to a wide range of stakeholders, and aiming to become a corporate group that develops sustainably and continues to be chosen, HIS has introduced non-financial metrics aimed at promoting Human Capital Management while maintaining its current remuneration structure (basic monthly remuneration, performance-linked remuneration, stock options, and restricted stock remuneration). Concurrently, we revised the evaluation metrics and
calculation methods for the performance-linked remuneration of Directors (excluding External Directors and Audit & Supervisory Committee members).

Rules related to remuneration calculation method and determination of remuneration

Remuneration amounts paid by the Company to its officers are set within the overall limit of remuneration approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders.
The amounts allocated to directors (excluding directors serving as members of the Audit & Supervisory Committee) are determined by the Board of Directors based on recommendations from the Compensation Committee, and the amounts allocated to directors who concurrently serve as members of the Audit & Supervisory Committee are determined through deliberation by members of the Audit & Supervisory Committee.
The policy for determining remuneration amounts is in accordance with the internal remuneration regulations established through deliberation by the Board of Directors and members of the Audit & Supervisory Committee and covers provisions related to the remuneration structure, remuneration determination criteria, and standard remuneration amounts

Remuneration policy

To have in place a competitive remuneration system with high degree of fairness 

  • Remuneration system and levels that are based on work responsibilities and performance (regardless of nationality or gender), and contribute to the acquisition

To have in place a remuneration system focused on improving corporate and shareholder value 

  • Remuneration system and structure that is closely correlated to earnings performance and focuses on improving medium- to long-term corporate and shareholder value

Remuneration composition

  Basic remuneration Directors bonuses Stock-based compensation
Remuneration type Basic monthly remuneration Performance-linked remuneration Stock option Restricted stock compensation
Share of remuneration 40%-48% 32%-40% 5%-9% 11%-15%
Time of payment Monthly Once a year Upon completion of medium-term management plan Upon retirement of each officer
Performance-linked or not Fixed Performance-linked Performance-linked Not linked to performance

Basic Monthly Remuneration

The amount is determined in accordance with the role and position as a Director, and is paid as fixed monthly remuneration.

Performance-Linked Remuneration

Based on the Director's position, a high performance-linked ratio is applied to incentivize improvements in company business performance for each fiscal year. Simultaneously, by utilizing items that evaluate enthusiasm and actions toward promoting Human Capital Management as evaluation metrics, we aim to realize sustainable growth and enhance the medium- to long-term corporate value of the HIS Group.
Performance Metrics Financial Metrics: Consolidated net income, Dividend payout ratio
Non-Financial Metrics: Job satisfaction index
Formula
(Calculation Method)
Total Performance-Linked Remuneration = Consolidated Net Income * (Consolidated Net Income Coefficient + Dividend Payout Ratio
Coefficient + Job Satisfaction Coefficient)
Individual Payment Amount = Total Performance-Linked Remuneration / (Total Position Coefficients of Full-time Directors * Position Coefficient)
If significant extraordinary income or loss is recorded, the calculation may be adjusted to take it into account.
Evaluation Metrics Reasons for Selecting KPIs
Consolidated Net Income Because it represents the continuous earning capacity of the entire Group from the perspectives of consolidated financial results and shareholder returns, serving as an important metric that leads to the
enhancement of corporate value.
Dividend Payout Ratio Because it clearly positions the balance between profit growth and shareholder returns within executive management incentives, strengthening the motivation to optimize capital policies.
Job Satisfaction Index Because it encourages investment in Human Capital, which is an intangible asset, achieving medium- to long-term corporate value creation without leaning heavily toward short-term profit-seeking.
Scope of Evaluation

Consolidated Subsidiaries

The job satisfaction index from the employee satisfaction survey conducted in the relevant fiscal year is utilized for the "job satisfaction coefficient," which is a non-financial metric.
Although the remuneration amount is calculated by multiplying each metric by a specific coefficient, these coefficients may be reviewed in the future to ensure a remuneration system that more closely reflects actual conditions in response to our medium- to long-term growth strategies, expansion of business scale, and changes in revenue structures.

Stock Options

This remuneration targets medium- to long-term corporate value enhancement and is designed based on the stock-compensation-type stock option system. The total amount will be issued within the annual limit (within ¥100 million per year) approved at the 36th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on January 26, 2017.

Restricted Stock Remuneration

By allocating restricted stock to Directors (excluding Directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee members, Non-Executive Directors, Part-time Directors, and External Directors) and having them hold our company shares, this system aims to provide incentives for sustainably
enhancing our corporate value. Simultaneously, it aims to promote further value sharing between eligible Directors and shareholders. The total amount will be issued within the annual limit (within ¥100 million per year) approved at the 37th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on January 25, 2018. (The base amount is calculated as: Basic Monthly Remuneration × Multiplier by Position).

Remuneration Level

To ensure objectivity and transparency in the determination process, the remuneration policies and levels for Directors and Executive Officers are reviewed by the Remuneration Committee and determined by resolution of the Board of Directors.

Other "Governance" Information